What is the Neuromancer trilogy about?

What is the Neuromancer trilogy about?

The Sprawl trilogy (also known as the Neuromancer, Cyberspace, or Matrix trilogy) is William Gibson’s first set of novels, composed of Neuromancer (1984), Count Zero (1986), and Mona Lisa Overdrive (1988).

Is cyberpunk based on Neuromancer?

As the name suggests, the game (which is based on a pen-and-paper role-playing game from 1988) is a homage to cyberpunk, a subgenre of science fiction that emerged in the 1980s with novels like William Gibson’s “Neuromancer” and films such as “Blade Runner”.

Why is Neuromancer important?

Neuromancer is important because of its astounding predictive power. Gibson’s core idea in the novel is the direct integration of man and computer, with all the possibilities (and horrors) that such a union entails.

Is Cyberpunk 2077 inspired by Neuromancer?

What did Chris Gibson do before he wrote Neuromancer?

Before Neuromancer, Gibson had written several short stories for US science fiction periodicals—mostly noir countercultural narratives concerning low-life protagonists in near-future encounters with cyberspace.

Who is the main character in the book Neuromancer?

Neuromancer. It was Gibson’s debut novel and the beginning of the Sprawl trilogy. The novel tells the near-future story of Case, a washed-up computer hacker hired by a mysterious employer for one last job against a powerful artificial intelligence .

What kind of awards did Neuromancer win?

The winner of the Hugo, Nebula, and Philip K. Dick Awards, Neuromancer was the first fully-realized glimpse of humankind’s digital future—a shocking vision that has challenged our assumptions about our technology and ourselves, reinvented the way we speak and think, and forever altered the landscape of our imaginations.

Why is Neuromancer considered a cyberpunk novel?

Neuromancer is considered “the archetypal cyberpunk work”. and outside science fiction, it gained unprecedented critical and popular attention, as an “evocation of life in the late 1980s”, although The Observer noted that “it took the New York Times 10 years” to mention the novel.